Charles Senteio

Monday, March 06, 2006

Family Values Proposed Legislation

This week I've become familiar with some pretty amazing legislation pending in Congress. The Republican House Judiciary Committee has introduced new legislation that, if passed, would represent extremely significant changes in how we deal with undocumented citizens (The terms illegal alien or alien are politically incorrect, and pretty damn insensitive). The proposal aims to criminalize undocumented immigration status and criminalizes organizations and individuals assisting undocumented immigrants.
Over the past year or so I’ve been blessed with the opportunity to support activities related to providing health care for a number of undocumented citizens. Central Dallas Ministries' Community Health Services provides health care access in a clinical setting for almost 1000 patients per month, 60% of them are Latino about half of whom are undocumented. My work with Dr. Walton has brought me into the homes of Dallas citizens from Guatemala, El Salvador, and Mexico. Dr. Walton takes care of some of the more difficult patients who have suffered gunshot wounds, car and other accidents. In every case these folks came to the US to earn money to send home to their families. In fact many of the stories are incredible when you begin to understand and appreciate what some of these folks give up to come to this country and work. They are to a person hard working folks who come here to improve the lives of themselves and their families. Of course our business owners freely take advantage of the ‘low-maintenance’ access to cheap labor and our government benefits from collecting social security from folk that will never collect. These folk seem eerily similar to the many immigrants, including my paternal grandparents, who came to the US over the past 150 years or so. It is estimated that 40% of all Americans had an ancestor arrive at Ellis Island.

Emma Lazarus’ The New Colossus, which is engraved on the base of the Statue of Liberty on Ellis Island, is worth a read:
Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

What a powerful message that seems to capture the spirit of this nation so much better than the actions of our politicians that to me appear obtuse at best, and overtly racist and bigoted at worst.

Some of these patients upon their injuries express a profound desire to return home, in many cases this is unrealistic given their health care needs resulting from their trauma. They really can’t leave even though they would like to.
As I learned of this pending legislation, I’ve pasted a summary below, I found myself amazed at how all too many of our elected officials define their role in public service. Hey, I’m all for securing borders and protecting this country against terrorists, but I fail to see how this legislation helps accomplish this important objective.

Important Immigration Legislation Pending in Congress
Something akin to a panic has descended upon the immigrants’ rights community with the introduction in December 2005 of Republican House Judiciary Committee Chairman Sensenbrenner’s HR 4437, The Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005. Passed last week in the House and poised to move quickly through the Senate, if passed, HR 4437 could signal some of the most sweepingly dramatic changes in immigration law since the now infamous Illegal Immigration Reform and Individual Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996 and could actually surpass that law in gutting judicial review and eroding due process. Nothing in the bill provides a comprehensive and realistic plan for our immigration system to enhance border security, support economic growth and provide a legal means to lawful permanent residency for the millions of hardworking undocumented immigrants and their families in the United States. Nearly 500 organizations, including a wide variety of civic, religious and business groups are opposing this legislation. Below is a summary of just a sampling of the areas of greatest concern to the ILRC. See also www.ilrc.org/criminal.html for more information about drastic possible changes regarding immigration consequences of criminal convictions that would result if HR 4437 were passed.
  • HR 4437 criminalizes organizations and individuals assisting undocumented immigrants
    HR 4437 greatly expands the definition of “alien smuggling” to include assisting a person to remain or attempt to remain in the United States when the “offender” knows the person is in the United States unlawfully – thereby treating social services organizations, refugee agencies, churches, legal services and others the same as smuggling organizations and imposing criminal penalties for providing such assistance. Even family members and charitable workers could face federal prison time for assisting undocumented immigrants.
  • HR 4437 criminalizes undocumented immigration status
    Under current law, presence in the United States without valid status is a civil violation, not a criminal act. HR 4437 would create a new federal crime of “unlawful presence” and would define immigration violations so broadly as to effectively include every violation, however minor, technical or unintentional, as a federal crime. In addition to permanently barring the entire undocumented population – including 1.6 million children – from the United States, this would also lead to the tragic separation of families as undocumented members of mixed-status families would never be able to secure lawful immigration status in the United States.

I guess if I continue working with and for the indigent then I may end up needing someone to visit me in prison, good thing many of my friends and co-workers will be there with me.

10 Comments:

  • Charles,

    Well I’ve got to commend you on your desire to assist the needy and those in need of care, BUT rules are rules. Criminalizing undocumented status is something I feel is far overdue. Your Ellis Island reference misses the target in that those who came to Ellis Island used the process that was available to them. It was also a different time. Time changes circumstances. The country (this country) had the resources to support the immigrants and the immigrants often left countries due to far worse circumstances than today’s immigrants.

    Your generous work with indigent is very commendable. The world needs more altruistic souls like you and your counterparts. However, from my patriotic view, the United States is currently in need of improvement in so many areas including security. Is it possible that the next undocumented immigrant (who just happens to be a terrorist) drives a U-Haul full of explosives into Texas Stadium during a football game?

    Aren’t there enough documented citizens in need that do not get the medical treatment they so desperately need? Your benevolence could help so many documented citizens.

    Some point counterpoint for you:

    “Dr. Walton takes care of some of the more difficult patients who have suffered gunshot wounds, car and other accidents.”

    Gunshot wounds? Could this be related to illegal activity?

    “In every case these folks came to the US to earn money to send home to their families.”

    In earning money, they also take money from US citizens and will work for far less than market value throwing the pay scale out of whack for our workforce. Some of the “undocumented” come here to earn money through illegal smuggling activities as exposed by the discovery of the tunnels from Mexico.

    “Hey, I’m all for securing borders and protecting this country against terrorists, but I fail to see how this legislation helps accomplish this important objective.”

    Terrorists don’t wear terrorist name tags. Undocumented could equate to terrorism.

    “What a powerful message that seems to capture the spirit of this nation so much better than the actions of our politicians that to me appear obtuse at best, and overtly racist and bigoted at worst.”

    If 60% of undocumented immigrants are Latino, I can’t see it as overtly racist. In Massachusetts, Portuguese and Azorean undocumented immigrants are being deported after being discovered in law violations (some very minor). They are Caucasian.

    “Even family members and charitable workers could face federal prison time for assisting undocumented immigrants.”

    If someone is a fugitive from justice, those assisting are subject to the laws of the land. Same applies to new laws. We can’t choose what laws to obey without being held accountable.

    Want change? Change the government. It’s too big for my taste and too involved with things it shouldn’t be anyway. But like it or not it is our system.

    And I'll be sure to visit you if you're incarcerated.

    By Blogger Fighting Father, at 9:27 PM  

  • The issue has been raised on Cape Cod. I will stand by the laws of the land.

    I don't agree with the war on Iraq, but I support our troops 100%. I feel the same about this issue. I feel the plight of the immigrants, but I support the enforcers of the policy 100%.

    By Blogger Fighting Father, at 11:46 AM  

  • Charles - I appreciated your post over on Larry's blog. Glad I found you.

    By Blogger KentF, at 12:12 PM  

  • This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:41 AM  

  • Thanks for reaching out Kent, look forward to more visits!

    By Blogger Charles Senteio, at 7:34 AM  

  • Hey,
    Thanks for the input and dialogue, at some level that is the point.

    Rules are rules??? I feel you on the ‘due process’ point however I still must disagree with our policy of criminalizing immigrants. My issue is that on the one hand small/medium business owners have no issues with taking advantage of cheap labor on one hand while professing for tighter border security on the other. My other issue is with our Government having no problems with undocumented citizens paying into a Social Security system that they’ll never collect from. This point somehow gets lost in the resource 'drain' discussions.

    I must admit that my direct data points are pretty much exclusive to Latin American immigrants, mostly from Mexico, that have settled in the Dallas area. To a person the folks I’ve gotten to know a bit are not here to be a drain or commit crimes. Of course some do but the majority certainly do not. This also seems to be factual at a broader scale. A recent study led by a Harvard Prof. which found that increased immigration, legal or illegal, is a major factor associated with the drop in crime rate over the 1990s.

    Appreciate the prison visit, hope I won’t need it! Thanks for the dialogue, keep it coming!

    Link to Harvard Study Article:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/11/opinion/11sampson.html?ex=1142744400&en=a62b13c7b0589e5c&ei=5070&emc=eta1

    By Blogger Charles Senteio, at 6:16 PM  

  • Thanks for the post Steve. I'm sure Mr. Boynes will weigh in, you guys may find some points of agreement.
    Great to see you back, missed you man ;-)

    By Blogger Charles Senteio, at 9:57 PM  

  • This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    By Blogger Fighting Father, at 1:25 PM  

  • In response to Steve:

    The undertone of your post is bordering insult. I’m not going to take extreme exception but I will not be swayed into extreme liberalism on this issue.

    My stance is simple enforce the laws on the books or change them.



    I happen to agree with enforcing an immigration policy. If someone enters this country under false pretenses or stealth, GET THEM THE HELL OUT! (Expeditiously!) It is against the law. I don’t want to pay taxes to support their medical needs (the Hippocratic Oath prevents them from being turned away) or foot the bill if they become incarcerated here. I’d rather pay for their transportation back to their homeland. How about Darwin’s Theory? You cannot save the world. If people desiring to live here cannot abide the process, that is too bad for them. Survive where you are. If I were living in my ancestors native land and wanted to live here I would work through the process.

    It is my opinion and I’ll stand by it.

    What was the immigration status of the 9/11 terrorists?

    “They are not taking jobs from other citizens.”
    Some may disagree. I believe that jobs are taken from Americans. There are those that believe immigrant labor is crucial to the success of American business. As long as corporate jets are flying and executives are bilking millions from these companies, wages at the lower end of the spectrum can be raised. I am of the belief that employing illegals oppresses those very workers into a demeaning level of servitude. Proper wages for all workers would attract people to these jobs. There are hard working Americans here. Latinos don’t have the market cornered on hard work.

    As far as the Statue of Liberty reference is concerned, women and blacks could not vote for eighty years while she stood tall welcoming immigrants. So if the founding fathers who owned slaves and following administrations that oppressed the rights of many were never wrong and are idolized by you, God bless. I don’t share the same sentiment. I’m living in today’s world.

    As a patriotic American who served in the military for over 8 years and enforced foreign policy in North Africa, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Kuwait, Iraq and Iran, I feel I am entitled to my RED, WHITE and BLUE opinion. The government could have saved the $50 per month hazardous duty pay and $100 per month combat pay that I received. I would have done it for free.

    I respect your opinions and even more your right to express them. I stand still during the National Anthem or during colors (the raising or lowering of the flag). I am an American.

    In closing, God Bless America and you too.

    Romans 13
    Submission to the Authorities
    1Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. 3For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and he will commend you. 4For he is God's servant to do you good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword for nothing. He is God's servant, an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. 5Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also because of conscience. 6This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God's servants, who give their full time to governing. 7Give everyone what you owe him: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.

    By Blogger Fighting Father, at 1:35 PM  

  • Boyles~
    You know what I find interesting about that passage of scripture is that you included it to demonstrate that the undocumented citizens should be held accountable because of God's laws. I'm no scripture buff so I'm not even going to try to argue with you on that. However, what stands out to me is that it seems like by using that scripture you make the assumption the "authorities" must be in the right. Is that because they are wealthier, have more education, etc. or is it because they are God's chosen ones (which, I think is what position Bush has assumed...I believe he said that early on...can't remember exactly)?

    I have a hard time believing just because the "authorities" are in a high position of power that they won't be held accountable for their actions as well. Doesn't scripture speak to that?? What about Isaiah and many of the other prophets? (I can't do Isaiah justice by cutting and pasting a few verses) Doesn't Isaiah talk about the corruption of the "authorities" and how God ultimately takes them out of power because they are oppressing the poor and have lost their ability to guide other nations due to their own corruption?

    I find that many easily proclaim judgment on the "least of these." I guess they're an easy target. But we seem to forget that God also holds the people in charge...the people in power... the wealthy...accountable for their wrongdoings--often to a much larger degree than he does the poor "aliens" (quoted from the Bible) in our land.

    By Blogger Janet Morrison-Lane, at 3:57 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home